Dnia 2013-08-20, o godz. 13:01:34 Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> Hello, > > Due to the widespread breakage in the tree noted in bug #480892 [1], > and mis-design of multilib-minimal.eclass, we'd like to put some more > work into getting einstalldocs() ready for EAPI 6. > > When it's mostly defined, we'd like to backport it to eutils.eclass so > that we could use it to fix the existing breakages. But for that, we'd > really prefer if we had a final spec for it so that the EAPI switch > could be as simple as disabling the function in eutils. > > Therefore, I'd like to open a final discussion for the features set > that is intended to be included in it, and it's name. > > [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480892 Proposed implementation follows: einstalldocs() { if ! declare -p DOCS &>/dev/null ; then local d for d in README* ChangeLog AUTHORS NEWS TODO CHANGES \ THANKS BUGS FAQ CREDITS CHANGELOG ; do [[ -s "${d}" ]] && dodoc "${d}" done elif [[ $(declare -p DOCS) == "declare -a "* ]] ; then [[ ${DOCS[@]} ]] && dodoc -r "${DOCS[@]}" else [[ ${DOCS} ]] && dodoc -r ${DOCS} fi if [[ $(declare -p HTML_DOCS) == "declare -a "* ]] ; then dohtml -r "${HTML_DOCS[@]}" elif [[ ${HTML_DOCS} ]]; then dohtml -r ${HTML_DOCS} fi } It's based on EAPI 4 src_install(). I've added support for DOCS=() and DOCS='', HTML_DOCS, and made dodoc recursive per Pinkbyte's request. In this form, it's suitable replacement for what's in autotools-utils & distutils-r1. It should be noted that if we're to backport it to all old EAPIs, 'dodoc -r' needs te be conditional to EAPI 4+. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
