Dnia 2013-08-20, o godz. 16:26:10 Sergey Popov <pinkb...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> 20.08.2013 16:08, hasufell пишет: > > I don't see how defining phases explicitly improves readability which > > even increases chances of overwriting phases by accident and having > > further complications especially in multilib eclasses. > > > > DOCS=( foo* ) > > > > looks pretty readable to me > > > > I am not for nor against this feature, but it would be nice to add > support for directories in DOCS variable. Cause, overwriting install > phase just to install directory with docs(instead of files) seems a bit > odd for me. Is there a future-eapi bug open for it? If not, please open one. I myself don't have anything against plain 'dodoc -r'. But I wonder if this isn't going to end up with people considering 'what if my directory has .svn/CVS in it?' -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
