On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:10:02 +0200 Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> El mié, 14-08-2013 a las 23:53 +0800, Patrick Lauer escribió: > [...] > > Well, it should reflect reality. > > > > PMS is still broken as much as it does not reflect the state of > > portage before PMS was written, and we've had to patch it up a few > > times to make it coherent, plus it is still lacking half the things > > that would make it useful as a standard. > > > > Your academic interpretation of standard as a platonic ideal > > disconnected from reality serves no purpose. > > > > On this topic I agree with Patrick: I don't fully understand why > things (like in_iuse from eutils.eclass) are missing from PMS. Why do things that can be in an eclass need to be in the PMS? Or more specifically, why would you like to see in_iuse in the PMS? -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
