On 08/14/2013 03:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-08-14, o godz. 16:53:17 > Sergey Popov <pinkb...@gentoo.org> napisał(a): > >> 14.08.2013 16:05, Rich Freeman пишет: >>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka <kensing...@gentoo.org> >>> wrote: >>> Right now, however, >>> it might be useful if only to get a sense for how they're being used, >>> trade ideas, etc. >> >> Well, we can use sets as replacement for metapackages(for example, >> qt-meta, leechcraft-meta). >> >> Well, as for leechcraft-meta, we can not simply replace metapackage with >> set, cause we have unstable USE-flag there. > > No, we can't. Sets are portage-specific, the tree needs to follow PMS. >
PMS is a waste of time, we should drop it until people are able to maintain it properly. They are obviously not. And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general progress in gentoo.
