On 16.06.2013 02:28, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > From the infra perspective, I would like to add that I support this > move, I just have a few concerns on the conversion, one of which is > dealt with here. > >> I've committed my draft XSL to the gentoo/xml/htdocs/xsl location, named >> guidexml2wiki.xsl. It still requires some updates that I'll work on soon >> (such as handling internal links) as I'll be using it more and more for the >> guides on gentoo.org/doc/en to move to the wiki as well. >> ProjectXML generates towards GuideXML, so should be usable chained. > It would be nice to move the foundation/ content to the Wiki as well I > think. >
Sure. It doesn't count as a project I guess, so you would move into
Foundation:.* ?
>> PS An ebuild for a single stylesheet seems like overkill to me, but i've
>> been proven incorrect in the past...
> I think it would help a lot of the devs that are put off by the concept
> of XML/XSLT. Just give them a little wrapper script to generate wiki
> output.
>
> One of my large concerns was how to handle some of the tag conversion.
> We have a lot of custom tags, plus some interesting behavior in some
> tags.
>
> Sven's XSL makes a very good start, but somebody needs to put in some
> TLC for the following tags in conversion, and/or can we have it emit
> something useful so we know when we hit a tag that's missing in the
> XSLT.
>
> Here's my list of tags found in proj/ that aren't in the XSLT so far:
> (the "/>" is just because I collapsed the tag of any attributes, there
> probably
> needs to be an audit of how the XSL handles attributes).
>
> 179 <body/>
ignore, needed by guidexml
> 145 <i/>
<i>.*?</i> -> ''\1''
> 74 <mail/> (optional attribute link)
This functionality is replaced by the {{Mail}} template.
Usage:
* {{Mail|a3li}} -> <a href="mailto:a...@gentoo.org";>Alex Legler</a>
* {{Mail|a3li|foo}} -> <a href="mailto@a...@gentoo.org">foo</a>
* {{Mail|a3li@g.o}} -> <a href="mailto:a3li@g.o";>a3li@g.o</a>
* {{Mail|a3li@g.o|foo}} -> <a href="mailto:a3li@g.o";>foo</a>
> 27 <dev/>
Project members will have to be recreated using the form.
> 25 <br/>
keep "<br />"
> 18 <license/>
Discard, everything is the same CC license, the old 2.x version allows
upgrade to the 3.0 we use.
> 15 <extrachapter/> (optional attribute position)
Discard, GuideXML specific.
> 9 <resource/> (attribute resource)
These resource things could just become a list:
* foo
* bar
* baz
> 7 <project/>
> 7 <name/>
> 7 <longname/>
> 7 <longdescription/>
> 7 <description/>
> 6 <subproject/> (attribute ref)
Dump information, contents need to be recreated using the form as well.
Longdescription should 'just' be the first paragraph of the wiki page.
> 4 <goals/>
> 2 <summary/>
> 2 <requirements/>
Does anyone actually use the goals feature? imo, discard.
> 2 <recruitment/>
> 2 <keyword/>
> 2 <job/>
> 2 <details/>
> 2 <contact/>
Discard. I have moved staffing needs already.
> 1 <var/>
> 1 <subtitle/>
> 1 <stmt/>
> 1 <ident/>
> 1 <const/>
>
We have proper syntax hilighting in the wiki. Discard?
> 1 <extraproject/> (attribute name)
Shouldn't these be proper projects?
--
Alex Legler <a...@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Security/Ruby/Infrastructure
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
