10.06.2013 19:15, Alex Legler пишет: > On 10.06.2013 14:36, Sergey Popov wrote: >> 09.06.2013 18:22, Alex Legler пишет: >>> I'd appreciate some input on below plan to move project pages to the Wiki: >>> >>> Motivation >>> ---------- >>> >>> The main motivation is to reduce the contents on the main website, >>> allowing for an easier makeover. Also, the Wiki exposes the contents and >>> an editing capability to more people, allowing for better collaboration. >>> Finally, this is an opportunity for projects to go through the contents >>> in their project spaces and update/remove outdated contents as well >>> Gentoo as a whole to remove orphaned projects. >> >> Err, i do not want to say that wiki is not suite for this purpose, but >> what's wrong with current situation? Is there something wrong with gorg? > > The software is unmaintained, and the website template is next to > unmaintainable. I could go on a bit more about this, but I think these > two points *alone* justify moving away from it. > >> Well, it is not always clear how to use some of it's features, but apart >> of that, why we should migrate to wiki? >> >> Just to clear orphaned project pages? > > No, I described multiple points. Again: > - Less contents on www.g.o -> we can much more easily relaunch it > - Users can more easily contribute to project documentation > - Update/purge project documentation > - Remove orphaned projects >
I did not know that gorg is not maintained. So yeah, in that case, i understand your decision. >> >> Why we can not just have official project pages, maintained as usual >> through gorg and additional info in wiki(if it is needed, for example, >> like we do on Gentoo Qt project page? >> > > In case it wasn't clear enough yet: This is step 1 of n to get rid of > gorg and GuideXML for the website (read: not main docs) aspects of Gentoo. > Running two project page venues increases maintenance instead of > lowering it. I intend to have less work after this change, not more. > > Do you have any concerns beyond 'never change a running system'? > For now - no, i am not. Thanks for clearing things for me. -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
