Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs

[viv...@gmail.com]

On 05/22/13 11:43, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 22/05/2013 19:22, viv...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 05/21/13 23:38, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013, 15:38:44 schrieb Thomas Sachau:
>>>> And if a maintainer is not responding within 30 days, you can ping him
>>>> or, without a response, try to get a different maintainer. Just
>>>> assuming
>>>> that a stable request is ok without a maintainer response is really
>>>> not
>>>> a good idea.
>>> If none of the listed maintainers responds to a bug in 30 days in
>>> any way, the
>>> package is effectively unmaintained.
>>>
>> And thus its risky to mark it stable.
>>
>>
> That's why we have arch teams in the first place, to test beforehand.
>
>
The risky part is about the after, not the before, to avoid the risks
arch teams should keep the package working *after* it has stabilized.
Seem to be a good case for those things that need to be evaluated case
by case and could not be written in stone.