On 05/21/13 23:38, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013, 15:38:44 schrieb Thomas Sachau: >> And if a maintainer is not responding within 30 days, you can ping him >> or, without a response, try to get a different maintainer. Just assuming >> that a stable request is ok without a maintainer response is really not >> a good idea. > If none of the listed maintainers responds to a bug in 30 days in any way, > the > package is effectively unmaintained. > And thus its risky to mark it stable.
- Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Thomas Sachau
- Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
- Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Markos Chandras
- Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Alexis Ballier
- Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
- Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Andreas K. Huettel
- Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Alexis Ballier
- [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs Ryan Hill
- Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Thomas Sachau
- Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Andreas K. Huettel
- Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs viv...@gmail.com
- [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs Michael Palimaka
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs viv...@gmail.com
- [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs Michael Palimaka
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs Thomas Sachau
- [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs Michael Palimaka
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs viv...@gmail.com
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs Ian Stakenvicius
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs Jeroen Roovers
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs Ian Stakenvicius
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs Ian Stakenvicius