Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:36:59 -0400 as excerpted: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> > wrote: >> it's at times like this i wish we had a git repo. `git log -p -C -M` >> is great at tracking this sort of stuff down. > > I don't want to hijack this thread, but I don't believe we have a > tracker for the migration of docs / website / etc to git. Is there > simply not interest? I'm not sure what complexities exist compared to > the portage migration.
I'd guess that would be upto the docs team, etc. And while they might conceivably be interested, it's evidently not a priority or (as individual projects lack the complicating issues of the tree in general) they'd probably have it done by now, just as the various other projects already running git-based overlays or whatever. The main tree is the big one, tho. With many projects already running git internally, once the tree switches over, it's probably pretty safe to assume everything else (possibly with an occasional exception) will as well. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
