On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 05:14:15PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > If that means doing an additional signature every time something is > going to be committed, that sounds like an overkill. If we were to do > something radical, I'd rather be in favor of disabling keyword > expansion completely and finally being able to do sane commits. I foresee it as more of: IFF this commit will call GPG later, ensure the agent can access the secret key BEFORE trying to sign at the end.
As to how to accomplish this, it's either a throwaway sig, or poking the agent protocol directly. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
