On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:44:18 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal <tomas.chva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into
> testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users
> could've reported some issues, i agree that sometimes you have to
> ignore the rules to really fix stable, but was this such case for
> sure?
I've done straight to stable keywording _many_ times. The rationale is
that with no previous version stable for a particular architecture,
there really are no users who could see _regressions_, hence waiting
the nominal thirty days is meaningless in this case.
jer
