On 3 March 2013 12:38, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: > Markos Chandras wrote: >> > I explain to you what happened >> >> "getting stuff done" is not an answer. I still don't understand why >> stable keywords had to be added directly. Do you understand why Mike >> did that or just playing smart here? > > To me it's obvious that he did it because it made something easier > for him. By breaking the Gentoo rule he got something done.
I asked why he did it, and you keep telling me because he had to. When you are in place to give me a more detailed answer please do so otherwise I am asking you to stop making noise on the list. > > >> Instead of you giving me cryptic and "smart" answers, you could >> have explained to me why it was necessary and job done. > > I have no idea what exactly became easier for him, and what it is may > be none of our business. Maybe it is not your business, but I am reviewing commits from time to time because: a) I often see useful tricks in ebuild writing so it is a good learning procedure and b) because some people may did a bad commit so I would like to be there and point them at it In this case, I would like to know the reasoning behind that commit. I am not the "Gentoo police", just trying to understand the commits that don't make sense to me. It this *that* hard for you to understand it? > > Again, I guess you have to make Mike go away now. > I never said that so please just stop it. -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
