On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu> wrote: > That being the case, splitting them in multiple packages might indeed be > a better option. Yes I know I'm the one pushing for using a single > package — as long as it doesn't have licensing issues of course.
Yup, a combined package that is fetch-restricted with 57 files in the SRC_URI isn't really something that anybody would like. Probably makes sense to have a few tiers: 1. Free 2. Non-free, but redistributable 3. Non-free, nonredistributable, but fetchable (maybe combine with #2) 4. Non-fetchable - do not combine. Rich
