On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:54:43 +0200 Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > That isn't necessary what could occur if the behavior changes > unexpectedly: as current behavior is already being assumed in > eclasses/ebuilds, portage couldn't change it without, before, porting > ebuilds/eclasses to use that new hypothetical behavior.
Sure it can. Portage supports what's in the spec. If you're relying upon undefined behaviour, it's your problem when it stops working. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
