El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 14:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:13:40 -0400 > Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > PMS may not need to be fixed, just the spec > > PMS is the spec, and it doesn't need fixing, since it accurately > reflects the situation we're dealing with. > > - -- > Ciaran McCreesh
What is preventing us from specifying current behavior in PMS? Current behavior is already working for ages and being used in the tree for a long time, then, the clear way to go is to document it and, if it needs to change in the future, specify new behavior on a newer eapi. It's the simplest solution, it should work, would prevent us from need to move current eclasses/ebuilds to worse ways of handling this to later revert that work.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
