On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:10:38 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 21:07:30 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:08:33 +0100 > > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:23:40 +0200 > > > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > An effective SDEPEND implementation is definitely nowhere close > > > > to simple. Nor is presenting those dependencies to users. > > > > > > Indeed it's not, but we *do* have a reference implementation and > > > lots of practical experience with it, and we have worked out all > > > the difficulties. > > > > Yes, I am pretty sure you tested it with *many different* packages. > > Maybe even all packages you have in Exherbo. Could you give some > > actual numbers, and details? > > That depends. Are we seriously considering this for implementation on > Gentoo at any time in the foreseeable future? Writing this all up > properly is a lot of work, and I don't see much point in putting in > the effort if it isn't going to go anywhere. Yes, we are. Zac was very positive about implementing it. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
