On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:08:33 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:23:40 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > An effective SDEPEND implementation is definitely nowhere close > > to simple. Nor is presenting those dependencies to users. > > Indeed it's not, but we *do* have a reference implementation and lots > of practical experience with it, and we have worked out all the > difficulties. Yes, I am pretty sure you tested it with *many different* packages. Maybe even all packages you have in Exherbo. Could you give some actual numbers, and details? > Having said that, if we're going with suggested dependencies for EAPI > 5 (which I strongly suspect won't happen, since we seem to be wanting > EAPI 5 now rather than in several years time...) then there's a lot > more to getting it right than is mentioned in the original post, and > it needs to be written up properly. Good to hear that. I always appreciate constructive critics with an explanation what needs to be fixed. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
