On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:30:02 +0200 Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 09:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:42:15 +0200 > > Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> Repeat after me: having your first process require anything more > >> than libc is stupid and dangerous. > > > > But you are aware that glibc is probably much, much worse than most > > of those 'stupid and dangerous' libraries, right? > > Then we have a bigger problem, since everything in our system is based > on that. Yes, we do, sir. > >> Once that concept gets accepted then we could discuss about why > >> reinventing shellscript may not be that sound and other less > >> glaring, horrid and appalling design choices. > > > > Yes, exactly. So why does openrc reinvent that horrible shellscript? > > It is not re-invented, in fact we can use any compatible shell. Or anything else what can be spawned for shell. And a lot more what you won't expect. And guess what, people are actually doing crazy things with it because someone forgot to tell them how a init.d script should work. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
