On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:42:15 +0200 Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Repeat after me: having your first process require anything more than > libc is stupid and dangerous. But you are aware that glibc is probably much, much worse than most of those 'stupid and dangerous' libraries, right? > Once that concept gets accepted then we could discuss about why > reinventing shellscript may not be that sound and other less glaring, > horrid and appalling design choices. Yes, exactly. So why does openrc reinvent that horrible shellscript? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
