On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:12:11 +0200 Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 16:02 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: > > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:59:50 +0200 > > Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > I am unsure about validate_desktop_entries() utility. It's > > > currently provided by eutils.eclass and only called by > > > net-firewall/fwbuilder. Shouldn't this be moved to a "qa" check? > > > Current way is pretty useless as it's not used by most of > > > packages, and calling it from a lot of eclasses/ebuilds doesn't > > > sound me like a good idea. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > Agreed. It should be in repoman. > > > > The check needs to be run over desktop file going to be installed, not > sure how repoman can handle it, it looked to me more like a emerge job > (like is done with other qa checks run before installation) Tfu, you're right. It should be in *however portage calls it runtime QA thingy* :P. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
