On 03/09/2012 09:48 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 16:57 +0100, Michał Górny escribió:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:02:23 +0100
Pacho Ramos<pa...@gentoo.org> wrote:
El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:56 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:51 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like
herds are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think
we should drop that herds and move their packages to
maintainer-needed in a week or so.
What do you think?
The same applies to "sgml" now that cryos is retiring :(
and text-markup, I think it's the last empty herd now
Maybe we could do the same as did in the past for openoffice herd:
- Change metadatas and bugs to assign them to maintainer-needed (and
reflect reality)
- Keep herd in metadatas and CCed them to bug reports
The other option would be to simply drop that herds, assign packages
to maintainer-needed and wait developers to grab whatever they want
For net-zope, I'd prefer dropping it. We decided to get rid of Zope,
removed almost all relevant packages, so there's no point in keeping
the herd.
OK but, what about the rest? ;)
Please leave at least media-optical@ be as it is. Changing it doesn't
make any sense.
