On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:17:30 -0800 Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 02/20/2012 05:03 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100 > > Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are > >> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near > >> stabilization)? > >> > >> I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for > >> testing purposes :-/ > > > > Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that makes > > people's systems unbootable. > > > > I'm also out of ideas and open to suggestions. > > Stabilize grub-1.99, and modify the grub-0.9x ebuilds to die if they > can't find a supported compiler. What's the state of 1.99? I know someone was working on it recently. We'd also have to update the handbooks. I think it could be several months of work to get it ready, and I'd like to unmask 4.6 last September. -- fonts, gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
