On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ryan Hill <dirtye...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100 > Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are >> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near >> stabilization)? >> >> I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for >> testing purposes :-/ > > Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that makes > people's systems unbootable. > > I'm also out of ideas and open to suggestions.
Is it a bad idea to go ahead and unmask it on architectures that don't use grub?
