-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger schrieb: > On Thursday 02 February 2012 17:56:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn > wrote: >> there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack >> of maintainer. However, their metadata.xml does not list >> [email protected] which I think should be the first step in >> searching for a new maintainer. > > if there is no <herd> and no <maintainer>, then > "[email protected]" is implicit. why do we need to explicitly > list it ? -mike
If that is the case, then removing would also be ok. But my point was that the packages still had other maintainers listed. Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8rNAsACgkQ+gvH2voEPRDbvACeKmIgmkscKmm4C4MbHMko90Bf 2+cAmwdjHK5IPzUF7ZDH4QvSSqRiZytE =rfFY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
