On Thursday 02 February 2012 17:56:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack of > maintainer. However, their metadata.xml does not list > [email protected] which I think should be the first step in > searching for a new maintainer.
if there is no <herd> and no <maintainer>, then "[email protected]" is implicit. why do we need to explicitly list it ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
