On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 19:30 +0100, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > * Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 18:40 Uhr: > > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:54 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:51:12 +0100 > > > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > /bin/systemctl > > > > libdbus-1.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 > > > > > > Here is a prime example of why "vertical integration" should really be > > > called "a horrible mess of tight coupling"... > > > > You clearly have failed to realize that d-bus is a now the bus for > > system messaging and is as much part of the system as syslog or bash. > > Probably even more so, for example, in Fedora 17, you'll be able to boot > > without syslog or bash, but you need d-bus. > > If this was true, we will soon have problems with linux systems that > windows had in 1995. > > IMO a system should *always* be bootable without that "high level" > stuff. And by bootable I mean that you can get a root prompt at > least.
d-bus is not high-level stuff... For example, you can't use bluetooth without d-bus. Even Android has it.. That said, in the new systemd world, bash is.. Since it's only a "UI" tools (just like gnome-shell for example). Since you don't need it to boot. -- Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
