-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 08/08/2011 05:58 μμ, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 of August 2011 20:32:32 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 08/02/2011 09:20 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> Hello fellow developers,
>>> 
>>> I would like to discuss the possibility to create a new virtual
>>> package for all the icon-theme packages. According to this
>>> bug[1], it seems like pcmanfm, and possible other applications
>>> too, require an icon-theme to be present, no matter which one. So
>>> I think it would make sense to create a new virtual package to
>>> include all the existing icon-themes.
>>> 
>>> ++: Avoid ugly dependencies like || ( x11-themes/foo-icon-theme 
>>> x11-themes/bar-icon-theme ... )
>>> 
>>> --: Not all packages include the same icons so users may end up
>>> with missing icons for some applications. However, most icon
>>> themes should include all the basic icons.
>>> 
>>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376309
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> since whatever gets added to the virtual should be at least almost
>> up to date with the spec, and provide the most common icons
>> 
>> virtual/freedesktop-icon-theme for name, just my opinion... 
>> http://standards.freedesktop.org/ as HOMEPAGE 
>> freedesktop-b...@gentoo.org as maintainer
> 
> ++
> 
> virtual/freedesktop-icon-theme is a better name IMHO as it's what
> this virtual icon theme actually is - theme compliant with
> freedesktop standard (so that can be used by applications claiming
> support like chromium, KDE, Gtk apps), not just some icon theme (as
> any instant messenger icon set would fall under "some icon theme"
> category for instance).
> 
Yes I will fix the name and the typo that was mentioned in another
reply. I will commit the virtual tonight.

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
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=lLna
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to