On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:19:21 -0400 "Anthony G. Basile" <bluen...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Is rlpkg going behind the PM's back when it does selinux labelings?
Yup. Also, note that PMS has wording for selinux. > I know there are difference, but if there's a screwup in some policy, it > also leads to horribly screwed up system. Nonetheless, I'm not > insensitive to what you are saying, and I think the safer approach > would be to write a howto and show the user how to manually convert > some typical binaries. There are only a handful that would be > targeted. Why are caps so important that we should be encouraging users to subvert things, yet at the same time not important enough that they should be handled properly? -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
