Jesús J. Guerrero Botella posted on Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:19:57 +0200 as excerpted:
> someone said fat32 compatibility is a feature we want (still can't guess > why, but well, be consequent...). I believe that "someone" that mentioned fat32 compatibility in the context of symlinks was me. But "we want" is rather strong for what I intended. More, "it's a factor to keep in mind", and "if we decide we do NOT want to keep fat32 compatibility, we should be sure the feature we're implementing that breaks it is worth the tradeoff." Maybe it is worth the tradeoff. Maybe it isn't. But either way, we shouldn't break that compatibility accidentally, simply because we didn't think of it as a factor. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
