On Sunday, November 07, 2010 15:47:52 Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 11/07/2010 10:40 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > On 11/7/10 8:51 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote: > >> As some of you are aware libjpeg-turbo is in the tree, with v8 support. > >> We will not keyword for any archs until we officially add the 1.1 > >> release that is not avaliable as of yet. If we all use virtual/jpeg we > >> can ensure that the user has the right to determine what version of jpeg > >> they wish to use. > > > > Is media-libs/jpeg binary compatible with media-libs/libjpeg-turbo? > > > > I'm not sure what to do with chromium-bin, which is compiled on a Gentoo > > system. > > libjpeg.so.62 -> media-libs/jpeg:62 > libjpeg.so.8 -> virtual/jpeg > > yes, it's binary compatible.
`ls` on filename doesnt mean it's binary compatible. it just means it *claims* to be binary compatible. has anyone actually looked at the exported symbol list and compared sizes of non-functions/etc... ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
