On 11/07/2010 10:40 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 11/7/10 8:51 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote: >> As some of you are aware libjpeg-turbo is in the tree, with v8 support. >> We will not keyword for any archs until we officially add the 1.1 >> release that is not avaliable as of yet. If we all use virtual/jpeg we >> can ensure that the user has the right to determine what version of jpeg >> they wish to use. > > Is media-libs/jpeg binary compatible with media-libs/libjpeg-turbo? > > I'm not sure what to do with chromium-bin, which is compiled on a Gentoo > system. >
libjpeg.so.62 -> media-libs/jpeg:62 libjpeg.so.8 -> virtual/jpeg yes, it's binary compatible.
