On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers posted on Wed, 26 May 2010 05:08:44 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> On Tue, 25 May 2010 23:40:44 +0200
>> Harald van Dijk <true...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, people like myself who don't normally wrangle bugs but try to help
>>> out occasionally. I'm not really interested in receiving all bug
>>> wrangler e-mails.
>>
>> Nobody should be required to read all that crap. :)
>
> I've often wished there was a way to flag a bug as "I'm not thru messing
> with it yet, don't mail anyone yet."  That's especially true when I know
> I'm going to be attaching 2-3 addition files, emerge --info, build log,
> maybe sth else like a config file or even a patch, where I know the
> wranglers are going to get all those extra mails.

Interesting, on most newer ticketing systems I've seen if you are
about to make a change there is typically some kind of UI element
(checkbox) that says something like 'suppress notifications.'  An
oft-used feature by me anyway when making cosmetic changes or making a
number of changes at once.  This assumes of course that anyone
interested in the bug will actually visit it to see the full set of
updates; not always the care for me and I imagine other users as well.

-A

>
> Or, if there was a way to attach files as part of the initial filing, but
> if there is, I've not found it.
>
> Alternatively, for normal bugs at least, maybe attaching emerge --info can
> be made a part of the process, with the post-submit note saying the bug
> won't be reported until that second step.  (Then for bugs that clearly
> don't need it, where the bug's clearly in an initscript or something, have
> a checkbox on that second step saying "emerge --info shouldn't be needed
> for this.")  That would both encourage emerge --info submission AND
> prevent one layer of bug spam at the same time! =:^)
>
> --
> Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman
>
>
>

Reply via email to