On Tuesday 25 May 2010 16:08:55 Harald van Dijk wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:33:33PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 May 2010 14:46:01 Matti Bickel wrote: > > > I wrangle bugs when there's a need and I'd > > > like to hear what maintainers want to see on a bug assigned to them. > > > If info is missing I usually ask for it and assign the bug anyway. If > > > that's not wanted, let me know. > > > > i dont feel like this should go to the maintainer yet. if a report is > > missing something that the maintainer needs, it isnt ready for them to > > look at. so wranglers ask for it, leave it assigned to bug-wranglers, > > and close as NEEDINFO. when (if) things become available, it can then > > be re-opened and moved to the maintainer. > > No, don't close as NEEDINFO, mark as ASSIGNED. NEEDINFO bugs cannot be > reopened by other users, even if they provide the requested information. > NEEDINFO bugs are also easily forgotten about when the reporter forgets > to reopen the bug him/herself.
and people on the wrangler alias see that traffic, so the state doesnt matter. but i guess you're trying to cater to people who only scan the assigned list rather than watching the e-mails sent to it. > Plus, it's in the docs anyway. then i guess i'll point this out to those who wrangle these things to maintainers w/out following the docs. thanks. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
