-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 14 May 2010 12:45:54 +0000 "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvice...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Following Petteri's thread last month about RESOLVED LATER and given a > issue that has been reported to User Relations about the "ab"use of the > VERIFIED status in Bugzilla, I'd like to get some feedback from fellow > developers. > We have a user that has been marking resolved bugs as verified following > his actions on other bugzilla(s) and he quotes the Bugzilla Docs[1] to > explain his actions. Some developers have become upset because of the > "spam" email that action causes. > It seems to me the reason those developers got upset is that they don't > value the VERIFIED status so I wonder if anyone uses that status or if > we should just drop it. If possible and useful, would we like to > restrict the VERIFIED status change to a specific group of people? > Please share your thoughts on this so we can decide how to act on this case.
Punt VERIFIED. It's useless for documentation and for everything else I do. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvtc8wACgkQxPWMzpKk6kOD2wCgqr+brRXJljXR+wDk8+fOETUG sQQAn3gJVt3rclCmXyqHfwu/D4fBgFkG =7I70 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
