El jue, 25-03-2010 a las 11:37 -0400, Richard Freeman escribió: > On 03/24/2010 11:47 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: > > Even then, it'll likely get > > installed first, as users will probably learn about p.masking it only > > *after* they install it. > > I don't have strong feelings on whether having v3 installed by default > is a big problem, but the last bit here probably should be addressed. > > The current news item only shows up for people with python 3.1 already > installed. Would it make sense to have it show up for anybody with any > version of python installed? Otherwise it is news after-the-fact. > > Rich >
Hello Maybe I have misunderstood anything (since I don't know much about python stuff) but, what would occur if I forget to mask python-3 and don't run python-updater. My plans would be to try to delay python-updater running until I switch to use python3, because some machines I maintain are quite old and takes some time to re-emerge all python apps :-/ Thanks for the info
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
