Josh Saddler wrote: > Lars Wendler wrote: >> Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of >> the "cdda" USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the >> decision to unify/convert the "cdaudio" USE flag into "cdda". >> If there's no good reason against this conversion I will proceed with filing >> bugs against packages using the "cdaudio" USE flag next weekend. >> >> Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) >> Gentoo Staffer and bug-wrangler >> Am Wednesday 08 July 2009 02:52:07 schrieb Duncan: > > I object. As discussed earlier in the list, I think "cdaudio" is much > more appropriate than "cdda".
As also discussed before, cdaudio is too vague and could mean various things, while cdda is a very specific thing. This technically correct term is less ambiguous, which is what we want here. Also, all the sound herd people I spoke are in favour of cdda. Ben sound herd dev
