Lars Wendler wrote: > Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of > the "cdda" USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the > decision to unify/convert the "cdaudio" USE flag into "cdda". > If there's no good reason against this conversion I will proceed with filing > bugs against packages using the "cdaudio" USE flag next weekend.
I'll handle it; cdda it shall be since we already have cddb as well. The technical term is the right one here. -Samuli
