2009-05-17 20:57:25 Robert Buchholz napisał(a): > On Sunday 17 May 2009, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have just updated GLEP 55 [1], hopefully making it a bit clearer. > > > > Just FYI, my order of preference of solutions is: > > > > 1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously) > > 2. EAPI in the filename with one-time extension change > > 3. Easily fetchable EAPI inside the ebuild and one-time extension > > change > > Judging from this list, fourth option present in the GLEP is > unacceptable for you? > 4. Easily fetchable EAPI inside the ebuild
+1 -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
