Tobias Scherbaum wrote: > Thilo Bangert wrote: >>>> Now what do people think about extending metadata.xml so that you >>>> could have these >>>> bugs filed automatically when there are no open bugs? Something like >>>> a <auto-stable-request enabled="true"/> >>>> element with the DTD setting the default as true and you could just >>>> use a <auto-stable-request /> shorthand. >> good idea. > > +1 > >>> I'm all for it. It would need to take version restrictions -- for >>> example, I may be willing to have xorg-server 1.5.x go stable but not >>> 1.4.x. >> perhaps auto-stable should be the default (not needing the tag), only >> allowing things to be masked from it. > > I'm not sure if it's really useful to have this as a default - for > example i keep nagios-3 packages intentionally ~arch for now. Tagging > them as "not ready for stabilization yet" would introduce something > between ~arch masked and package.mask - i don't think that's worth the > effort. > > From both a maintainers and arch-developers view: I'd like to see > automatically generated stable requests, but I'd leave it up to the > maintainer/herd/team to add architectures after a quick review (also if > there's a auto-stable-request tag set in metadata!). > > Tobias
So we would have <auto-stable-request add-arches="false" /> with it defaulting to true. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
