Thilo Bangert wrote: > > > Now what do people think about extending metadata.xml so that you > > > could have these > > > bugs filed automatically when there are no open bugs? Something like > > > a <auto-stable-request enabled="true"/> > > > element with the DTD setting the default as true and you could just > > > use a <auto-stable-request /> shorthand. > > good idea.
+1 > > > > I'm all for it. It would need to take version restrictions -- for > > example, I may be willing to have xorg-server 1.5.x go stable but not > > 1.4.x. > > perhaps auto-stable should be the default (not needing the tag), only > allowing things to be masked from it. I'm not sure if it's really useful to have this as a default - for example i keep nagios-3 packages intentionally ~arch for now. Tagging them as "not ready for stabilization yet" would introduce something between ~arch masked and package.mask - i don't think that's worth the effort. From both a maintainers and arch-developers view: I'd like to see automatically generated stable requests, but I'd leave it up to the maintainer/herd/team to add architectures after a quick review (also if there's a auto-stable-request tag set in metadata!). Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
