Alec Warner kirjoitti:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Leverton wrote:2008/9/5 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file name.But is it so much simpler as to justify adding a special gitweb-specific hack to the package managers?Well, it's not much different from the existing file extension logic that's already built into the unpack function. I think what really matters is whether or not the majority of people see it as a useful extension.I think the question isn't 'why is this functionality being made available'; I think to me it is useful piece of code.I question its inclusion in the PM though; I would rather see it in eutils or something similar.Arguably you could inherit a function from eutils that does SRC_URI transformation for you.SRC_URI="foo bar baz;sf=tbz2" src_uri_gitizewould transform "baz;sf=tbz2" into "baz;sf=tbz2 -> baz.tar.bz2"
I think this is better than having it in EAPI2. You could even move SRC_URI above inherit and automatically transform the URI.
Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
