On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 14:02 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > В Срд, 11/06/2008 в 19:45 -0400, Jim Ramsay пишет: > > Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I would prefer something that > > > doesn't add extra lines to ebuild. > > > > I think I would disagree with you here. I think that having a special > > 'eblank' or 'eseparator' command is much more readable in an ebuild. > > Taking into account that as einfo, ewarn and eerror work without any > arguments too are there any benefits from eblank/eseparator?
Not really and part of my thought process was less lines, less code. Not more or staying the same. No matter what it is, typing anything on a single line to get a new line is more than should be required IMHO. Want a single line of output with blanks lines before and after. One has to code 3 lines in ebuild. That should be 1 line to get 1 comment, with auto-blanks per flag/switch, or etc. 1 line of code 3 lines of output, efficient. 3 lines of code, 3 lines of output. Not so much. -- William L. Thomson Jr. amd64/Java/Trustees Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
