Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As for why it would be more useful than eerror/ewarn without an > argument: it would potentially allow for intelligent "context-based" > coloring of the "*" (based on surrounding lines).
Well, this is true and it isn't... In the case of: ewarn line one eblank ewarn line two Obviously it would be the same as ewarn. However, what about here: ewarn line one eblank elog line two eblank einfo line three I'm not sure how you could make a function like that smart enough to really know what to do... so perhaps since the author is the only one who can really know what colour they intend, they should just use the appropriate ewarn/elog/einfo without args. -- Jim Ramsay Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
