On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:36:01 +0200 Thomas de Grenier de Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or you apply to future EAPI's cache formats one of the solutions that > have been proposed for the ebuild side of the very same "chicken / egg > problem": for instance, you could use $EAPI as cache filename > extension. > > And that's it, you can get EAPI from the cache, hence no more extra > reading of ebuild files, and no more perfs issues. > > It sounds so simple, am I missing something obvious?
You're missing the cases where the cache isn't usable. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
