On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:37 +0200 Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And why don't we change the versioning of the EAPI to a "X.Y" scheme > and demand that changes in the minor version must not break sourcing > of the ebuild with older package managers and that major versions do. > Major version numbers are written in the postfix, while minor version > numbers are written in the ebuild itself as EAPI_MINOR="1". So, the > current EAPI 1 would then be in fact "0.1".
No point. A 0 package manager still couldn't use a 0.1 ebuild. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
