Piotr Jaroszy?ski wrote: > Hello, > > looks like every nominee wants the council to be more technical so I > have a few technical questions for you: > > 1. GLEP54 Doit!
> 2. GLEP55 Good idea. But the GLEP still contains too many "may"'s and "should"'s. Example: "[...] but note that one should never explicitly set both EAPIs to different values. [...]". Define it clearer: "It is not allowed to set both EAPIs.". And why don't we change the versioning of the EAPI to a "X.Y" scheme and demand that changes in the minor version must not break sourcing of the ebuild with older package managers and that major versions do. Major version numbers are written in the postfix, while minor version numbers are written in the ebuild itself as EAPI_MINOR="1". So, the current EAPI 1 would then be in fact "0.1". Cheers, Tiziano -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
