On 21:07 Wed 05 Mar , Santiago M. Mola wrote: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Anant Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some of you may argue that we already have proxy-maintainers. That's a > > great idea, all I'm asking for is for us to formalize the position. > > Giving a proxy-maintainer an official acknowledgement will definitely > > attract more users to contribute. > > IMO the problem with proxy-maintainers is that most users don't know > such a thing exists. I bet some users could proxy-maintain a lot of > orphaned packages if we potentiate proxy-maint.
++ IMO giving proxy-maintainer due credit and publicity, meaning make it a formal position, could solve the very problem Anant's proposal intended to solve. Zhang Le -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
