On Wednesday 05 March 2008 14:59:55 Doug Goldstein wrote: > Thomas Anderson wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 March 2008 14:41:32 Petteri Räty wrote: > >> Thomas Anderson kirjoitti: > >>>> Please elaborate on how a "full.fledged developer" would differ from a > >>>> "package maintainer" technically. What requirements and/or > >>>> priviledges do you think could be reduced? > >>>> > >>>> Marius > >>> > >>> Perhaps there could be some honor code system at least, where the > >>> package maintainer would be restricted to their area of maintainership. > >> > >> This is the current situation. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Petteri > > > > Exactly, only the "package maintainers" wouldn't have everything that a > > full dev would have... > > What exactly wouldn't they get? What would differ them from Arch Testers?
Arch Testers don't have tree access. This proposal gives the package maintainer the ability to commit their changes. -- "Taylor and Anderson, Metropolitan prosecutors. Commit a crime? See you in court"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
