On Thursday 20 December 2007 22:33:25 Joe Peterson wrote: > Technical reasons to avoid the filename are: > > 2) Having the same info in more than one place is bad (requiring extra > repoman checks and the potential for ambiguity).
As opposed to adding checks to make sure that obtaining the EAPI from the contents of the file doesn't require bash? > 3) It uses the extension in a way that goes against common use in computers. What? It uses the extension to determine the format of the contents? -- Bo Andresen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
