-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Hill wrote: > Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: >> Marius Mauch wrote: > >>> We already have this with USE_EXPAND. Not exactly the same syntax, but >>> I don't see a terrible problem in that, and we don't have to fix all >>> three trillion related tools to handle it. Unless you can come up >>> with a case that can't be handled with USE_EXPAND. > >> No, USE_EXPAND is only a way to abbreviate use flags with a common substring >> in their name, such as "impl_guile impl_sbcl impl_clisp" which could be >> encoded interchangeably as either > > You're kidding, right?
No, if what I'm saying makes no sense it is ignorance. Please enlighten me. Marijn - -- Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHCkNVp/VmCx0OL2wRAv1/AJ9GBpu8wL6NL4Xw8sawwPEeHAmkdQCeJFqF fq8NiFnqnV9NBErojijBW+A= =LO9y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
